Williams v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Michael Williams (“Movant”) seeks post-conviction relief via a Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted for robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, § 571.015. 1 Movant alleges, inter alia, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not requesting a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense of stealing. The motion court denied Mov-ant’s claim without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues for reversal and claims the evidence adduced at his criminal trial warranted instructing the jury on the lesser offense of stealing, and he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MeaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. HinemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Brooks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Arnold v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009