Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1979No. 39910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Movant’s appeal from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion alleges the trial court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing and denying relief under the motion. We affirm.

Movant’s motion stems from his pleas of guilty to two charges of second degree burglary and stealing and a separate charge of stealing over I50.1 He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each burglary charge and five years on each stealing charge, with all sentences concurrent. In his Rule 27.26 motion, movant alleged three bases for relief: (1) the disparity in length of sentences imposed on him as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Boyer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Burgin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Turnbough v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Giggar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API