Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Wilkins

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 22, 1945No. Divorce, No. 31PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is plausibly argued for the defendant that by the personal service of process on the defendant and by her appearance in the cause this Court has jurisdiction of both the subject matter and the parties, and should grant the motion, so that it may be possible for the defendant to secure an affirmative decree in her favor.

In Brown v. Brown, (Del. Super.) 29 A. 2d 149, this Court had occasion to consider some aspects of the origin of jurisdiction in matters of divorce. It was there pointed out that insofar as jurisdiction of matrimonal causes was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Close v. Southern Maryland Agricultural Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  2. Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brown v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1942
  4. Patten v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Wuest v. WuestNevada Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. S. R. v. D. R.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. McDonald v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. S. R. v. D. R.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API