Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Gunn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1925No. 16138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. The exception to the judgment overruling the demurrer to the petition, not having been referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in- error, is treated as abandoned. Atkinson v. Olmstead, 140 Ga. 100 (2) (72 S. E. 720) ; Union Warehouse Co. v. Roper, 21 Ga. App. 182 (1) (94 S. E. 74).

2. Although it is true that, where a married woman borrows money for the purpose of paying her husband’s debts, and the lender, though knowing of her purpose, is not the husband’s creditor who is thus to be paid, and is not a party to the arrangement or scheme between the husband and wife which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Hood v. DurenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Parks v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Shepard v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gunby v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Pope v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Dunnaway v. FortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API