Legal Opinion

In Re Thomas-Pinkney

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2004No. 02-BG-974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Adopting the recommendation and most of the findings of an Ad Hoc Hearing Committee, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Catherine Thomas-Pinkney, a member of our Bar, be disbarred. This division is bound by the court’s decision in In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190 (D.C.1990) (en banc), and in a number of post-Addams cases, including In re Micheel, 610 A.2d 231 (D.C.1992); In re Pels, 653 A.2d 388 (D.C.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 812, 117 S.Ct. 58, 136 L.Ed.2d 21 (1996); and In re Anderson, 778 A.2d 330 (D.C.2001), and we thus adopt the recommendation of the Board.

In its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re PelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re VerraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re Bernard Gray, Sr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API