Legal Opinion

Kysor Industrial Corporation v. Pet, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1972No. 71-1916PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Kysor appeals from an order denying its motion to remand the case to the State court from which it was removed.

Since this order is interlocutory, appeal ordinarily would await final judgment on the merits. However, Kysor’s motion for a preliminary injunction also was denied. Because the case is properly before the court for review of the latter action and since the remand question is jurisdictional, the remand issue must be reached. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp., 184 F.2d 537, 538 (3rd Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 903, 71 S.Ct. 610, 95 L.Ed. 1342 (1951).

We reverse.

The relevant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Pci Transportation, Inc. v. Fort Worth & Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. O'Halloran v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Fairfax Countywide Citizens Ass'n v. County of FairfaxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API