Legal Opinion

Stobinsky v. Kyser

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Meier Steinbrink, Spec. Ref.

This is an action for a judgment declaring the ¡rights and obligations of the parties. The action is by a person claimed to have been injured in an áccident involving the automobile owned by one Kyser and driven by one Brownlee. While these individuals and the owner and operator of another vehicle claimed to have been involved in the accident have been named as defendants, they have not been served and have not appeared. Services only was made upon defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Insurance Company hereinafter referred to as 1‘ Employers ’ ’ and upon the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marino v. GaglianoNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API