Legal Opinion

Chew-Bittel Associates, Inc. v. Crusader Savings Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Chew-Bittle Associates, Inc. brought an action against Crusader Savings Bank, contending that the bank, after payment, had improperly reclaimed the proceeds of a check on which the plaintiff had been named as payee. The trial court sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint, holding that payment of the check could properly be revoked because of an inaccurate endorsement. After careful review and for the reasons which follow, we reverse.

When considering a trial court’s order granting preliminary objections in the nature of demurrer, we accept as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. C & K Petroleum Products, Inc. v. EquibankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re GravesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. National Check v. First Fidelity BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Lombardo v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Fleet Consumer Discount Co. v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Guyer v. Zimmerman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API