Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snead v. Bonnoil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1900Published

Appeal from trial term. Action by Harry V. Snead against Maurice Bonnoil. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1DissentIngraham, J.

I am unable to concur in the affirmance of this judgment. The action is for false imprisonment, the charge against the defendants being that they (the defendants) “maliciously, and with intent to injure the plaintiff, by force compelled plaintiff to go with them to the central police office or headquarters, situate in said city of New York, and there imprisoned this plaintiff, and then and there detained him, restrained of his liberty for the space of forty-eight hours, or thereabouts, without reasonable cause, and without any right or authority so to do.” The defendants, who were police…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meserve v. FolsomSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  2. Doherty v. MunsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API