Legal Opinion

Kesner v. Buhl

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 25, 2022No. 1:20-cv-03454Unknown

1Opinion

Weoley v. Faul wpaul@ paullawgrp.com 902 Broadway, □□ □ New York, New York 10010 PAUL LAW GROUP Limited Liability Partnership T: 646.278.9955 | F: 646.514.6829 March 24, 2022 VIA ECF Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2201 New York, New York 10007 Re: Kesner vy. Buhl, 20-cv-03454 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y.) Letter Motion for Costs and Fees pursuant to FRCP Rule 54 Dear Judge Engelmayer: We write the Court to request costs and fees pursuant to FRCP Rule 54(d)(1) (“Costs Other Than Attorney’s Fees”) and Rule 54(d)(2) (“Attorney’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Mahoney v. Yamaha Motor Corp. U.S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. FrankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API