Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 15, 1989No. 88-684Published

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 1138 (1989)

Ex parte Arvel James HILL.

(Re Arvel James Hill

v.

State).

88-684.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 1989.

Rehearing Denied November 9, 1989.

Gary L. Blume, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Robin Blevins, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SHORES, Justice.

James Arvel Hill was found guilty by a jury in Tuscaloosa County of one count of rape in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the second degree. On appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion. 541 So.2d 83. We granted certiorari to consider whether it is proper to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API