Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Jahoda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Having failed to appear in opposition to the cross motion which sought, inter alia, to dismiss the cross claims of the codefendants against the defendant town, the defendants Jahoda are not aggrieved parties (CPLR 5511).
The plaintiff Carol Ann Hughes, who was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned by the defendant Robert Jahoda and operated by the defendant John F. Jahoda, was injured when the vehicle struck a utility pole on or about the roadway at 61 Cove Road in Huntington. Among the allegations of negligence leveled against the defendant town were its failure to post proper warnings,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Canzano v. Town of GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- De Francisci v. BaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Reinert v. Town of JohnsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bacon v. ArdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Shao v. Fugazy Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991