Legal Opinion
Milan Express Co. v. Western Surety Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1989No. 88-5960PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff motor carriers appeal from a district court order denying their motion for class certification and dismissing their freight-bonding action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs contend that their ease arose under an act of Congress regulating commerce. 28 U.S.C. § 1337(a). As payment for transportation services provided to allegedly delinquent property brokers, plaintiff motor carriers seek the proceeds of surety bonds prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), pursuant to federal statutes and regulations. 49 U.S.C. § 10927(b); 49…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jarrett v. KasselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Clark v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Milan Express Company, Inc. v. Western Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Jarrett v. KasselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Milan Exp. Co., Inc. v. Western Sur. Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.