Legal Opinion

People v. Farrell

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

*580OPINION OF THE COURT

Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.

The defendant, Richard B. Farrell, has moved for an order dismissing the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 30.30. The main issue to be determined is whether, after stating that they were not ready for trial in open court in the presence of the defendant and his attorney, requesting an adjournment to an unspecified future date for trial, and agreeing that they would serve and file a statement of readiness if they became ready, the People may mail the defense attorney a statement of readiness that same day, file it with the court, and validly “stop…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. StirrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API