Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1997No. CV-97-0118-SAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

945 P.2d 1251 (1997)

190 Ariz. 120

STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Roderick G. McDOUGALL, Phoenix City Attorney, Petitioner.

v.

Hon. Malcolm STROHSON, Magistrate of the Municipal Court of Phoenix, Arizona, Respondent, and

Dale W. CANTRELL, Real Party in Interest.

No. CV-97-0118-SA.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

September 4, 1997.

Roderick G. McDougall, Phoenix City Attorney by Ronald Ozer, Assistant Phoenix City Prosecutor, Phoenix, for Petitioner.

Neal W. Bassett, Phoenix, for Dale W. Cantrell.

Lowell D. Hamilton, Mesa City Prosecutor by R. Kevin Hays, Chief Assistant City Prosecutor, Mesa, for Amicus…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API