Bradford v. McQuesten
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an action of contract to recover of the defendant the amount assessed upon him by the board of har*81bar and land commissioners under Pub. Sts. c. 19, § 14, as compensation for the displacement of tide water caused by the extension of his wharf at East Boston. The case was heard upon agreed facts, and judgment was ordered in the Superior Court for the defendant. The plaintiff thereupon appealed to this court.
The displacement for which compensation is sought was caused by the filling by the defendant of a portion of the land and flats formerly belonging to one Donald McKay, and which have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamlin v. Pairpoint Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Hastings v. GrimshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Mayo v. LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- First Construction Co. v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Commissioners of Public Works v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Treasurer & Receiver General v. Revere Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Trio Algarvio, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.