Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Van Gaalen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 28, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

Tire petition for construction requests a ruling as to the meaning and effect of paragraph Seventh of the decedent’s will, the pertinent portions of which read as follows:

A. I direct my Executor hereinafter named to hold one-half of my said residuary estate, in trust nevertheless, for the following uses and purposes:

To hold, manage, invest and reinvest the same and to receive and collect the income and profits therefrom and, to pay to or apply the net income to the use of my dear friend, lorenzo belasco, so long as he shall live. I hereby authorize and empower my said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the Manufacturers National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Rezzemini v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. In Re the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EscherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. In re the Estate of CrowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  4. In re the Estate of BrowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  5. In re the Estate of SchramNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API