Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Snyder

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1919Published

Motion for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The question is whether a plaintiff who has given an undertaking upon securing an injunction, but has not joined in it with the surety, can be held liable upon it. This arises on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

At common law there was no liability of the party securing the injunction, though it was erroneously granted, unless it was obtained maliciously and then the action was. one for malicious prosecution. Harrison v. Hind & H. Plush Co., 128 App. Div. 460; City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar R. Co., 221 N. Y. 206, 208. And the rule is the same now in this state except as modified by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Harrison v. Hind & Harrison Plush Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API