Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance v. Cooper

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

'Appeal from District Court, Burleigh County, Winchester, J. Mandamus by State, on the relation of the State Farmers’ Mutual Flail Insurance Company, against E. C. Cooper, as Commissioner of Insurance.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s application for a writ of mandamus against the defendant, requiring him as insurance commissioner to receive and entertain plaintiff’s application for leave to transact a hail insurance business in this state. The facts are agreed upon by the parties, and are as follows: That the relator is an insurance company organized under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on the Mutual plan, and that its business is the insurance of growing crops against hail. It has submitted to the defendant an application for leave to transact a hail insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Busby v. RileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HaggeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Braatelien v. DrakeleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Ahern v. AndersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API