Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Lange

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 15, 2016No. Docket Nos. 14-2442-cr, 14-4443-cr, 14-4559-crPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIN, Circuit Judge:

In 2014, following a six-week trial, a jury found defendants Brad A. Russell and Kristofor J. Lange (“Kristofor”) guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and securities fraud (Count Two) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and substantive securities fraud (Count Three) in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78ff. The jury also found Russell guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a separate but related scheme (Count One) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Both defendants moved for a judgment of acquittal. The district court (Irizarry, C.J.) granted…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. CabralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Thomas C. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Christos Potamitis, Eddie Argitakos, and Steve ArgitakosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Kirk Tang YukCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. HolcombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Campo FloresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API