State v. . Rhyne
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT for peddling without license, tried before Brown, J., and a jury at Fall Term, 1896, of Lincoln Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion of Associate Justice MONTGOMERY.
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, J.:
The defendant was indicted for peddling harrows and cultivators without the license required by law, the wares being not of his own manufacture. The special verdict set out that the defendant had carried a wagon with him, exhibiting and delivering the wares which were manufactured by the American Harrow Company, of Detroit, Mich. ; that he sold, and at once at the time of sale, delivered one of the harrows, taking the note of the purchaser to the company ; that the defendant was employed by the company to sell the harrows, and was paid fifty dollars per month and nothing more…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Temple v. SumnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900