Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Madden v. Barr

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Relators were apprehended pursuant to warrants issued by a member of the Board of Parole of the State of New York for violation of parole and incarcerated in the city prison pending their return to State prison for determination by the Board of their alleged delinquency. They now seek release by habeas corpus on the ground that the Parole Board has no jurisdiction over them. In answer we find returns, supplemental returns and even additional supplemental returns, met bjr traverse and also supplemental traverse. While the facts in the four cases differ in detail, and the same principles of law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Atkins v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. People Ex Rel. Cecere v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. People Ex Rel. Newton v. . TwomblyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. People ex rel. Brackett v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. People v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sullivan v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. People ex rel. Reilly v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. People ex rel. Sormberger v. Martin, New York County Courts1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API