Legal Opinion

Curry v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

This is an action for personal injury. Plaintiff recovered and defendant appealed.

■ Plaintiff received the injuries for which he sues in a wreck September 1, 1922. In the petition plaintiff invoked the rule of res ipsa loquitur. The answer is a general denial and a special plea that the wreck was caused by an unprecedented rainfall and flood which could not have been foreseen or anticipated.

Error is assigned (1) on the petition; (2) on the refusal of an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence at the close of the case; (3) on the admission of evidence; and (4) on the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Price v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Burge v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Michaels v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API