United States v. Fabio Ochoa-Vasquez

*1048Other than the First Amendment1 and jury issues, I agree that Ochoa’s arguments would not warrant reversal. However, because the jury selection in this case was so deficient in due process, I believe Ochoa, should be granted a new trial. Specifically, I think that after empaneling an anonymous jury, the district court inexplicably failed to take the simple precautionary measures that would have been adequate to protect Ochoa’s presumption of innocence or his right to an impartial jury as required by United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507, 1520 (11th Cir.1994). Additionally, I believe the jury…