Legal Opinion

Carr v. Brownfield

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 27, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment setting aside a default judgment and granting a new trial to the appellee, Brownfield, in an action in which he was the defendant and *624the appellants^ J. W. Carr and wife Ada Carr, were the plaintiffs.

Counsel for Brownfield has filed in this Court a pleading designated an “answer” in which he prays that the appeal be dismissed on technical grounds relating to the bill of exceptions, and failure to file motion for an appeal. Counsel would be in better position to take advantage of his adversary’s defections if he had complied with the rules himself.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noe v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Schmidt v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  4. Benberry v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  2. Whelan v. Memory-Swift Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API