Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that neither Sections 3957 and 3958, General Code, nor Sections 41 and 1415 of the Code of 1919 of the city of Toledo, Ohio, create nor authorize the creation of a lien upon real property for charges for water supplied by such city to the premises of defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Pfau v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. TysonOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Musca v. Village of Chagrin FallsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981