Legal Opinion

Finance Corp. v. . Rinehardt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in this action brought suit against the defendants to recover $414.00 which it alleges was due upon a conditional sales contract, reserving the title to a certain Buick Sedan, and note, originally executed to the J. T. Setzer Motor Company, and by that company transferred to the plaintiff, which claims to be holder in due course.

The defendants set up that the J. T. Setzer Motor Company obtained the contract and note through fraud after they had fully settled for the car and paid all that was due upon the purchase price contract, which they alleged was a totally different contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Medlin v. . BufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Nicholls v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
  4. Security Finance Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API