MICHALSKI v. LITTLE
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIE DIVISION MICHAEL A. MICHALSKI, ) Plaintiff ) No. 1:22-cv-262 ) v. ) RICHARD A. LANZILLO ) Chief United States Magistrate Judge GEORGE LITTLE, et al., ) Defendants ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ) ) ECF NO. 95 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Swank Motion Pictures (“Swank”), a non-party, to comply with a subpoena to produce documents that Plaintiff issued upon it pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. See ECF No. 95. Swank has served objections to the subpoena…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- W. Simon Katz v. Batavia Marine & Sporting Supplies, Inc., and Def-Tec Corporation, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Flatow v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Walker v. CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.