Legal Opinion

MICHALSKI v. LITTLE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00262Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIE DIVISION MICHAEL A. MICHALSKI, ) Plaintiff ) No. 1:22-cv-262 ) v. ) RICHARD A. LANZILLO ) Chief United States Magistrate Judge GEORGE LITTLE, et al., ) Defendants ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ) ) ECF NO. 95 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Swank Motion Pictures (“Swank”), a non-party, to comply with a subpoena to produce documents that Plaintiff issued upon it pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. See ECF No. 95. Swank has served objections to the subpoena…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. W. Simon Katz v. Batavia Marine & Sporting Supplies, Inc., and Def-Tec Corporation, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Walker v. CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API