Willis v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Tom M. Willis appeals an administrative decision requiring him to pay the state more than $13,000 in child support arrears and $157 in ongoing monthly payments to reimburse the Child Support Enforcement Division for public assistance it paid on behalf of Willis’s two young daughters. Although CSED reduced Willis’s ongoing child support obligation by applying Alaska Civil Rule 90.3(e)’s “good cause” exception, Willis challenges the reduction as insufficient. He also challenges CSED’s unexplained failure to reduce his arrears under the same exception.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Babinec v. YabukiAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willis v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1999