Legal Opinion
Bartosch v. Lewison
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1987No. C1-87-337PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Harriet and Arlen Bartosch sued Kim and William Lewison for injuries suffered by Mrs. Bartosch as a result of an automobile accident. The jury returned a special verdict finding negligence but awarded no damages. The Bartoschs moved for a new trial on the grounds of irregularities in the jury’s special verdict, misconduct of Lewi-son’s counsel, errors of law in the admission of collateral source evidence, and that the verdict of no damages was not supported by the evidence. The motion was denied and this appeal followed. We affirm.
FACTS
At dusk on June 8, 1984, Kim…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Theodore Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Seydel v. ReuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Meinke v. LewandowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Smith v. CarriereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Paul Allen Frumkin v. Mayo Clinic, Paul Allen Frumkin v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- James v. GlazerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of HastingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.