Legal Opinion
Sewell v. Singh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on November 2, 1989, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion to strike the action from the Trial Calendar on the ground that pretrial discovery proceedings have not been completed, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion the motion denied, and the matter restored to the Trial Calendar, with costs.
In this personal injury action, which arises out of a May 29, 1987 automobile accident, plaintiff served a bill of particulars on September 6, 1988, together with a notice of availability…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Long Island College HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kanterman v. PalmiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Jacobs v. PeressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Cooper v. CheekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Crespo v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dominguez v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Urena v. Bruprat Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Verrengio v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Santiago v. 679 Waring Avenue LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004