Legal Opinion

New York Times Co. v. Regenhard

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 N.Y.3d 477 (2005)

829 N.E.2d 266

796 N.Y.S.2d 302

In the Matter of THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al., Appellants-Respondents, and CATHERINE T. REGENHARD et al., Intervenors-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF NEW YORK FIRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 9, 2005.

Decided March 24, 2005.

David E. McCraw, New York City, for appellants-respondents.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (John Hogrogian, Lawrence S. Kahn, Pamela Seider Dolgow and Marilyn Richter of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Norman Siegel, New York City, and Kramer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gould v. New York City Police DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. New York Times Co. v. RegenhardNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Russo v. Nassau County Community CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API