Legal Opinion

Roy v. Normand

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1925No. 2295Published

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is a suit against Clifton Norman, Clemile Normand and Lester Normand for $100.00 damages for cutting thirty-six trees belonging to plaintiff.

It is admitted by both plaintiff and defendants :

1. That the only issue involved in the case is the value of the timber cut by ■ defendants on plaintiff’s land.

2. That defendants cut from plaintiff’s land thirty-six ash trees.

3. That defendants made plaintiff a legal tender of $36.00 before this suit was filed.

Under the pleadings and the above admissions the only question that this court is called on to determine is the value of the thirty-six ash…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. E. C. Drew Investment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. J. F. Ball & Bro. Lumber Co. v. Simms Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. McGee v. Louisiana Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Schlater v. GaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API