Legal Opinion

Wardsworth v. Sibley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MOTIONS to quash writs of Geriiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

A motion is made in each of these causes to supersede or quash the common law writs of certiorari which have been issued by this ’court. The writs are directed to the county court of Milwaukee county, and were sued out for the purpose of bringing up to this court for review final judgments of that court. It is claimed that the county court rendered judgments in these causes without having acquired jurisdiction of the defendants in the action, and that a common law writ of certiorari is an appropriate remedy for correcting the error. In support of the motion, it is insisted that the writ will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. S. U.H.R.R. Co. v. . BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Hauser v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Owens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GouletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Call v. Town of AftonWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Perkins v. PeacockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Dalrymple v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API