Ellis v. Ellis
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentCampbell, J.
I agree that a support order in a decree is only effective during the period of time that the child is a minor. However, I disagree that emancipation automatically *509changes the status of a child from a minor to an adult. I agree with the trial court that under ORS 107.135(2) it had no power to set aside the child support payments which had accrued as a final judgment prior to the time that the father filed his motion to modify the decree. I would therefore affirm the trial court.
The majority in effect says the decree only requires payment for the support of minor children and there was no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mansfield v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Matter of Marriage of EagenOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Construction Corporation v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Forbes v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.