Legal Opinion

General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The defendants were partners at Grand *546Rapids, Michigan, in the tire business for about ten years prior to January 9, 1920, when they dissolved partnership. Mr. Noble purchased Mr. Bissell’s interest and continued the business under the trade name “The Grand Rapids Vulcanizing Company.” No direct notice of the dissolution was given by the partners to the plaintiff. Mr. Noble assumed the partnership debts, but this fact was not directly communicated to the plaintiff, who sold goods to the partnership. After the dissolution but before the plaintiff had notice of it the defendant Noble, who…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenger v. HulstMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Heller v. MattarDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API