Legal Opinion

Bright v. Mollohan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Braxton County. Bill by Amos Bright and others against C. E. Mollohan and others. ' Decree for plaintiff, and J. P. Thompson appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

Thompson claimed a commission from Bright and others for making sale of a tract of timber. Mollohan claimed that he made the sale and that the commission was due to him. Each claimed under a separate and distinct contract with the vendors of the timber. Mollohan sued the vendors, Bright and the others, in assumpsit for the money he claimed. Thompson also, ten days later, sued them in assumpsit on his contract.

Thereafter Bright and the others brought the suit that is n'ow before us, praying that prosecution of the two actions so instituted against them be enjoined, and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKain v. MullenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eakin v. EakinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stone v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ritchie v. ArmentroutWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Souders v. LeatherburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. LaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API