Legal Opinion

Kramer v. New York Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1936PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff, as beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by the defendant on the life of her husband, seeks to recover under a double liability provision contained in the following clause of the policy: “New York Life Insurance Company agrees to pay to Esther A. Kramer . . . Three Thou*441sand Dollars ($3,000), (the face of this policy) upon receipt of due proof of the death of Morris Kramer, the Insured; or double the face of this policy upon receipt of due proof of the death of the Insured resulting directly and independently of all other causes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Hand v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Josi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Ruschetti's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API