Ruddock v. Lodise
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The trial court in this case excluded the deposition testimony of one of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. We conclude that the exclusion of this testimony was clearly erroneous and warrants a reversal and a remand for new trial.
I
Plaintiff Roger Ruddock was injured when his motorcycle collided with an automobile being driven by defendant James T. Lodise. The accident allegedly occurred when the defendant, in an attempt to pass other traffic in his lane, pulled into the lane of oncoming traffic, striking the motorcycle on which Mr. Ruddock was riding. The accident allegedly occurred in a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'DOWD v. LinehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Freed v. SalasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Blake v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Thon v. Saginaw Paint Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.