Legal Opinion

Metz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1934No. 16767Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— There is probably no better settled law in this State than that the admission of testimony without objection, renders unavailing other objections to the same matter. Bryant v. State, 109 Texas Crim. Rep., 38, cites many authorities from West v. State, 2 Texas App., 460, down to the present time. See also Anderson v. State, 110 Texas Crim. Rep., 241; Tindale v. State, 122 Texas Crim. Rep., 31. We think the court correctly let the witness Slaughter testify to what deceased said to witness just after the fatal difficulty, the same testimony having been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Tindale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API