Legal Opinion

State v. Lovingier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 2016No. CR1411339; A160184Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree theft. ORS 164.043. He assigns error to the trial court’s imposition, in the judgment, of a $60 “Mandatory State Amt.” Defendant asserts that the trial court lacked statutory authority to impose that assessment. The state concedes that the trial court lacked authority to impose the $60 assessment and that that portion of the judgment should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state’s concession. See State v. Nutt, 274 Or App 217, 220-21, 360 P3d 636 (2015), rev den, 358 Or 551 (2016) (discussing trial court’s lack of authority to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. NuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API