Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Pannaci

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 6, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On appeal of the First National Bank of Sea Bright from a rule of the District Court, first judicial district of Monmouth county, making absolute a rule to. show cause why said bank should not be required to pay to the sergeant-at-arms of said court the amount of a money balance to the credit of the defendant, in part satisfaction of an execution issued under plaintiffs judgment in this cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

This is not a case for an appeal. As appears abdve, the judicial action attempted to bo brought under review is an order of the court, or the judge, in what may be described as a statutory garnishee proceeding, evidently under the supplement of 1915, page 182, to the Executions act, which makes rights and credits of a defendant in execution subject to levy thereunder, and by section 9 authorizes the court by procedure of the character of that apparently pursued in this case, to order the debtor of the defendant to pay the debt to the officer…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Bank v. AinscowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API