Legal Opinion

City of Corpus Christi v. Lone Star Fish & Oyster Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1960No. 13656PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

Appellees have filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental transcript containing, among other things, “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,” and an “Amended Order Granting a Temporary Injunction.” The motion will be granted. We will not consider but will strike the “Amended Order Granting a Temporary Injunction,” because it was made and entered after the City had perfected its appeal from the original order granting a temporary injunction.

When the appeal was perfected by the City, the trial court lost jurisdiction of the cause and such jurisdiction passed to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ex Parte Travis and MathewsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. General Telephone Co. v. City of WellingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Rattikin Title Co. v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Ahmed v. Shimi Ventures, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Humble Exploration Co. v. Fairway Land Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
  4. State v. Cook United, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Gulf Holding Corporation v. Brazoria CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API