Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Napierala (In Re Napierala)
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1 We review the report filed by Referee Kim M. Peterson, adopting a stipulation between the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Thomas R. Napierala. The referee agreed that Attorney Napierala committed three counts of misconduct, as alleged in the OLR's complaint. The referee further agreed with the parties that a public reprimand is an appropriate level of discipline for Attorney Napierala's misconduct, that Attorney Napierala should be ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $15,021.66 to a former client, T.A., and should be assessed the full costs of the proceeding, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SchusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Vaitys (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Vaitys)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas D. VaitysWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas R. NapieralaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024