State Ex Rel. Brennan v. SUPERIOR COURT ETC.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Bobbitt, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe that there was a substantial compliance with Rule 2-35, particularly since relator’s.. statement that he presented to respondent judge a written motion, which questioned the jurisdiction of the trial court, a copy of which is set out in relator’s reply to respondent’s return, is supported by a statement in ■ respondent’s return that about three o’clock p.m. on February 26, 1960, relator’s counsel “returned to Respondent Court and renewed the request that Respondent change the judgment and the commitment and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Brennan v. SUPERIOR COURT ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1960