Mateo v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Felix Mateo brings a challenge under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2003) to his sentence for drug trafficking. In calculating Mateo’s sentence, the Court increased his criminal history category because Ma-teo had been on state-court probation— and subject to a probation violation warrant — at the time of the federal offenses. Mateo argues that his sentence must now be revised, because after sentencing Mateo obtained a state court order terminating his state probation nunc pro tunc to a time prior to the federal offenses. Deciding an issue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mateo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Milton v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- United States v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Frazier v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005