Legal Opinion
Holt Motor Co. v. Nicholson Universal S. S. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 1, 1944No. Civil Action No. 590PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for breach of contract. Its business was that of dealing in automobiles at wholesale and retail, and, as a part thereof, it distributed Chrysler and Plymouth automobiles through dealers in territory generally appurtenant to Minneapolis, its principal place of business. It contends that on November 7, 1940, it advised the defendant, a common carrier by water on the Great Lakes, that it was in a position to arrange with the manufacturers of Chrysler and Plymouth cars to advance the normal production schedules of the factory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Annapolis RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Union Packing Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1974
- J. M. Asbury T/A Asbury Coal Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- New York Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962