Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Walter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2001No. 99-35552PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Howard William Flowers, a Washington state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed Flowers’s second petition after concluding that it did not rely on “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A) (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.

I

BACKGROUND

On January 17, 1979, Flowers was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Michael A. CLEMMONS, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Browning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. ToshDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
  4. Benson v. TerhuneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. Browning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API