Legal Opinion

Nockles v. Eggspieler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wimieshieh Circuit Court. Action on attachment bond to recover damages for wrongfully and maliciously suing out an order of attachment. There was a trial, judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

I. It is assigned for error that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Such motion embraced thirty-two causes, and we are satisfied it cannot be claimed that all of them are well taken. Some of the causes embraced in the motion are insisted on by counsel in his argument, and are not otherwise assigned as error. Such an assign*401ment is too general, and not as specific as the case will allow. It must, therefore, be disregarded.

II. It is also assigned that the court erred in admitting certain parol evidence to contradict the notes and contract. But we fail to find that such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. . BinningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Crawford v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Border v. BengeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  4. Ralston v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steen v. Ross, Keen & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Peters v. Snavely-AshtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Petty v. Lang and AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Nockles v. EggspielerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API