Legal Opinion
Haceesa v. Heim
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1972No. 811, 841, 847, 848, 849, 862PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Appellants appeal an adverse ruling of appellee which reduced their Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefits. The factual and legal issues are the same in each case and have been consolidated for appeal.
Appellants’ children were budgeted for AFDC benefits, including a clothing allowance. When the children went to a boarding school the benefits for the children were terminated except for the clothing allowance. The children were encouraged to return home for weekends and holidays by the boarding school authorities. Food and shelter were provided by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Tijerina v. BakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Baca v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Trujillo v. Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brunner v. State Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- McCarthy v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- In re Victor Marshall (I)New Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- Pellman Ex Rel. Pellman v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hughes v. State ex rel. Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.